Cymbeline
Director: Michael
Almereyda
Writer: Michael
Almereyda (from William Shakespeare's play)
Starring: Dakota
Johnson, Penn Badgley, Ethan Hawke, Ed Harris, Milla Jovovich, Anton
Yelchin
Rating: Two and a
Half Stars Out of Five
There is no new way
out there left to adapt William Shakespeare. He's been done in the
classic sense, in which the most minute details of the period and
play are adhered to. He's been done in strange pseudo realities, like
Julie Taymor's Titus. Sometimes his plays are plopped in a
modern setting and sometimes his words get chopped up, rearranged,
refitted, and redesigned for the adaptation's purposes. In Baz
Luhrmann's Romeo + Juliet, arguably the best cinematic
adaptation of the Bard's work, there is a mix of all those, to
thrilling effect.
The point is, a
filmmaker is unlikely to hit upon a new direction to take
Shakespeare's plays, so the choice that is left is in which previous
direction – or combination of previous directions – suits the
play being adapted. Are the play's specific turns and settings and
events truly analogous to modern day? Is realism befitting something
with such highly poetic dialogue? Is that dialogue necessary or is
the true worth of the play in its structure and themes? Should the
actors be chosen for their training and familiarity with
Shakespeare's work or should modern sensibilities and naturalism rule
the day? These and other questions must be answered and reexamined
from the inception of a new project involving the work of such a well
known creator. You can't just pick any angle and call it a day,
expecting your small contribution to the man's work to result in
transporting cinema.
That is where the
problems with Michael Almereyda's new adaptation of Cymbeline crop
up. With some script changes here and there, he generally leaves the
text untouched but situates it in the modern day, with the British
upstarts run by King Cymbeline (Ed Harris) portrayed as a biker gang
and their Roman overlords as police officers in repainted LAPD cars.
Milla Jovovich's scheming Queen character is reminiscent of a mob
wife. So far, so fine, whatever. These changes are nothing
revolutionary, but they retain the spirit of the work for the most
part, which is an adaptation's job.
Where Almereyda first runs into trouble is in casting. As the two lovers at the film's center, Imogen and Posthumus, Dakota Johnson and Penn Badgley are incorrect. Much of Johnson's skill as a performer lies in her comic timing and naturalistic presence, a riffing, improvisational quality that draws strength from her ability to listen and react to the other people onscreen with her. Shakespeare's style does not lend itself to these strengths, all authoritative, flowery language and precision. At times, Johnson's discomfort with the material is visible as these regimented lines struggle to leave her lips. She fares much better at the visual aspects of Imogen's arc, with her eyes searching to trust people and always being let down by their pettiness and manipulation. As for Badgley, well, he's handsome. The lines aren't a huge difficulty for him, but he is fairly blank in delivering them, and he seems less full of youthful angst than Ambien. The film would greatly benefit from swapping Badgley and Anton Yelchin, who gives a spirited, lively-ish performance as Imogen's stepbrother, Cloten.
Where Almereyda first runs into trouble is in casting. As the two lovers at the film's center, Imogen and Posthumus, Dakota Johnson and Penn Badgley are incorrect. Much of Johnson's skill as a performer lies in her comic timing and naturalistic presence, a riffing, improvisational quality that draws strength from her ability to listen and react to the other people onscreen with her. Shakespeare's style does not lend itself to these strengths, all authoritative, flowery language and precision. At times, Johnson's discomfort with the material is visible as these regimented lines struggle to leave her lips. She fares much better at the visual aspects of Imogen's arc, with her eyes searching to trust people and always being let down by their pettiness and manipulation. As for Badgley, well, he's handsome. The lines aren't a huge difficulty for him, but he is fairly blank in delivering them, and he seems less full of youthful angst than Ambien. The film would greatly benefit from swapping Badgley and Anton Yelchin, who gives a spirited, lively-ish performance as Imogen's stepbrother, Cloten.
In a
larger sense, Cloten, unfortunately, is another example of the film's
issues. He is subtext made text via the literalizing properties of
choosing a modern lens for the adaptation. Whereas the character is
meant to be in love – or at least lust – with his adoptive sister
from afar, the film makes that as crystal clear as possible. It's
creepy, sure, so that box gets checked, but the certainty of his
intentions is somehow less unsettling than if they were left just
beneath the surface. Ditto for the film's handling of Ethan Hawke's
Iachimo, whose sleazy, violating intrusion sets everything in motion.
Hawke gives a fine, slimy performance as the lying dynamo, but
Almereyda's insistence on including the trappings of our modern world
takes much of his power away. Whereas the play hinges on the
character's con man abilities to convince Posthumus of Imogen's
untrue unfaithfulness, Iachimo's access to iPhones and Photoshop
feels like a lack of trust in Hawke's abilities as an actor. This is
a character who should be able to weave a tale of deception through
words alone – doctored evidence is untrue to the strength of the
character.
While
Almereyda takes some turns with the material that don't work, he does
a lot of the little things so well so as to make up for some of the
conceptual misfires. His use of music is so refreshing. While most
films of this era are drenched in unremarkable, wall-to-wall
orchestration, he lets most of Cymbeline's
conversations breathe. He trusts Shakespeare's words to have enough
power to make the point by themselves without resorting to extra
manipulative tactics like swelling strings. At one point, when it
first appears he loses the script on this point, Almereyda pulls a
gotcha by cutting to reveal the music being sung by Jovovich's Queen,
thus making the song the point rather than an unnecessary enhancer.
The same goes for a later scene which makes diegetic use of Toots &
The Maytals' “Pressure Drop,” which is perhaps a little on the
nose for the theme of the moment, but when used in conjunction with
visual montage instead of playing over dialogue like a top-down
decree to understand the importance of
a scene, it works. Much like his sense of music, Almereyda makes a
move in the right direction for the future of low budget, high
definition digital moviemaking. While the limits of the medium are
still present – everything looks too clean, indoor scenes must be
lit less harshly to avoid looking like a sitcom, among other things –
the way he shoots outdoor sequences looks terrific. A car chase along
a bridge on Los Angeles's outskirts is stark, with the magic hour sun
gleaming, showing a better life just outside Posthumus's grasp. A
burial site in a quarry of what looks like giant charcoal chips is
gorgeous and evocative of crumbling granite, much like the broken
kingdom portrayed in the story.
Unfortunately,
these technical achievements aren't quite enough to overcome
Cymbeline's flaws, but
they are indicative of a filmmaker trying things that don't work,
rather than someone unable to put together a competent piece of
cinema. It's a failure of ambition and effort, and a light failure at
that. There's no striking out looking with Almereyda.
No comments:
Post a Comment